In “The Big Exit,” author Ian Sutton explains why we are so unprepared to bury the bodies of billions of boomers projected to die over the next several decades, while urging us to examine eco-friendlier alternatives. According to Sutton, we are running out of space to bury the dead. And the rising popularity of cremation comes at a cost as it negatively impacts the environment. But don’t fret. Sutton walks you through more than a few innovative disposition ideas to consider, including how or where to find the means to do so. You might ultimately decide to blast your ashes into space, compost yourself or donate your body to improve lives in the future.
The book serves as Sutton’s plea: It is imperative that we think about employing better ideas now, not later. We are dying from the day we are born, much like a ripening banana, yet individually and collectively, we are reluctant to prepare for it. Although the book does relay some dire warnings, “The Big Exit: The surprisingly urgent challenge of handling the remains of a billion boomers” is not all doom and gloom. Sutton told the host of “Full Comment” podcast, “I didn’t want it to be particularly morbid, but it’s hard to avoid that.” However, Sutton believes the subject of death can also be entertaining in some fashion.
Death of the Cemetery
There is a shortage of cemeteries in the U.S. and globally, Sutton warns. Most are running out of room, and we have not built any substantial new ones in decades. Space is becoming so limited that some cemeteries now allow only the burial of ashes. A few have resorted to double decker gravesites, meaning that anybody currently buried can be dug out and buried deeper, so another body can be buried on top of it. And others are creating vertical cemeteries in an effort to save space.
Additionally, the burial premise we have set causes decomposition to happen at a slower rate, thanks to padded coffins and cement vaults. As if this were not enough to spur a need for change, Sutton explains how embalming fluid has been discovered in water supplies near many of our modern-day burial grounds. All the while, burial remains a common and costly means of disposition.
Eco-Friendly Alternatives
Since the process of cremation causes greenhouse gas emissions, Sutton makes it clear there is an urgency to consider other alternatives. Thankfully, an abundance of eco-friendly disposition avenues are available and on the rise. Aquamation, often referred to as water or chemical cremation, is quite environmentally sound. However, it is sparsely available and unaffordable for most. Green burials may be less toxic than standard practices, but are bound to certain places and may not be readily accessible to everyone.
Alternatively, Sutton notes, “Composting isn’t just for food waste.” The body can be placed in a vessel and covered with organic materials like wood chips or straw. Add a little bacterium, fungi, oxygen…and “voila!” The body is reduced to organic matter in a matter of months. But perhaps the most natural (although somewhat disturbing) disposition choice is something called “excarnation.” Sutton explains this is the act of leaving your body atop a mountain where wild animals and nature can break it down by the means in which they have done for centuries.
Regardless of what you choose, Sutton encourages you to vet the pros and cons before investing in any means of final disposition.
Are You Prepared for the Inevitable?
For the more adventurous souls who want to make “The Big Exit” (pun intended), why not wrap yourself inside a mushroom burial suit to quicken the decomposition process? Or how about sculpting your cremated ashes into cement anchors to create living reef memorials at the bottom of the ocean? But if sustaining human life is most important to you, you might donate your body to science. Researchers can study how the body decays to develop new decomposition technologies, or perhaps they might discover new ways to extend life itself.
However we want to be remembered when we die, disposition takes some planning. This is key for us, for our family and for the planet. We should not rely on funeral directors to live up to their marketing slogans to make your death wishes come true. Sutton implores us to plan it for ourselves. We can take control of our eventual departure without burdening loved ones with promises, decisions or associated costs.
No matter what we may ultimately choose for ourselves and our bodies, Sutton invites us to plant a tree. After 500 years, one single tree can wipe out the carbon footprint that one human life leaves upon this earth. Nature is the best weapon we have to counterbalance the collective effects humans continue to cause to the world, dead or alive.
Hi, I have read this book and while the content is sound and interesting, it is poorly edited which may startle some readers. Also, it is not complete and omits some interesting points, particularly dealing with co-op funeral homes. I am a founding director of the Funeral Co-operative of Ottawa. We started the planning in 2008 and opened in 2013 but Ian has omitted this Canadian establishment, which is a pity.
Report this comment
This in fact this was by not omitted. The author indeed did make reference to the Canadian funeral co-op movement. It was pointed out that funeral co-ops have been well established in Canada as far back as 1965 in Alberta. It was also pointed out that a funeral co-operative movement is also active in Quebec, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, Manitoba and the three-co-ops in Ontario. (contrasting with Canada’s — and its provinces — lack of initiatives in legalizing new environmentally-friendly disposition technologies.) The co-op movement in Quebec with over 170,00 members, has affiliates in such diverse locations as Peru, Puerto Rico and France.
The author elaborated on co-ops in Alberta and Quebec, but regrettably could not include specific reference to individual co-ops, such as Ottawa’s along with several others.
Funeral co-ops are also active and successful in the United Kingdom. However, aside from two remarkably successful co-ops in the United States, there has been to date a regrettable lack of interest to date in a co-operative movement — due largely, I was advised — due to the a prevalent political atmosphere.
Perhaps the success of co-ops in Canada, the UK and the two in the US, will create a growing demand among American who, as death-care consultant Shane Neufeld told me (as one will see in my book) “are just tired of what’s going on.”
Report this comment
Thank you M Nash and Ian Sutton for your lively debate. May I suggest that it would be nice for our readers to understand the difference and benefits of funeral co-op. Given your comments I would assume they are now quite curious.
Suzette Sherman, SevenPonds Founder
Report this comment
Excarnation? I thought I had heard of it all! I had a past boyfriend who promised me that at the end of his life he could hike deep into the wilderness to die. His body never to be found. I was unclear why he promised me this or why anyone would desire to die that way. I suspect he never considered he may be too weak or old to do so. Granted he’s a biologist and that may explain his kind of earth-to-earth dust-to-dust (animals ripping you apart) thinking.
Report this comment
Ian has worked for a long time on this important book and it covers all options that are available today. I found it to be excellent!
Report this comment
A great book!
Nice work Ian.
John
Report this comment