Water Cremation Faces Similar Backlash to Its Fiery Predecessor

Credit: Burst

The concept of alkaline hydrolysis, often called “water cremation,” has stirred significant debate in recent years. As an eco-friendly alternative to traditional cremation, it uses water, heat and chemicals to decompose human remains. However, this method has faced resistance, much like cremation did when it was introduced as a modern practice in the late 19th century. By examining this parallel, we can better understand how societal attitudes towards death and body disposition evolve over time.

Historical Resistance to Cremation

Cremation, now a widely accepted practice, was initially met with fierce opposition. Rooted in centuries of Christian doctrine, burial was considered the only acceptable method of handling human remains. The belief that the body was sacred and destined for resurrection made cremation seem irreverent, even heretical. Resistance also came from cultural inertia — centuries of tradition weighed heavily against change.

It wasn’t until the late 1800s, during the scientific and hygienic reforms of the Victorian era, that cremation gained traction as a sanitary and practical alternative to burial. Even then, religious groups, including the Catholic Church, staunchly opposed it. It took decades of advocacy and legislation, culminating in the Vatican’s eventual acceptance in the 1960s, for cremation to become normalized.

The Debate Over Water Cremation

Today, alkaline hydrolysis faces similar pushback. Legal battles, like those in Texas, highlight the tension between scientific innovation and societal norms. Critics argue that dissolving bodies and disposing of the resulting liquid lacks dignity. Religious organizations, such as the Texas Catholic Conference of Bishops, have been particularly vocal, likening water cremation to a violation of human sanctity. They object not only to the process but also to the imagery — liquefied remains poured into the sewer — evoking visceral discomfort.

Practical concerns compound ethical objections. Missteps by institutions like the University of North Texas Health Science Center, which reportedly used water cremation without family consent, have fueled distrust. The lack of transparency and respect for donor wishes undermines the potential acceptance of this method.

Credit: Wikimedia Commons

Environmental and Economic Considerations

Proponents of alkaline hydrolysis argue that it aligns with modern environmental consciousness. Traditional cremation emits significant carbon dioxide, while burial consumes land and can leach harmful chemicals into the soil. Water cremation offers a cleaner, more sustainable option. It is also cost-effective, saving institutions and families money. Despite these advantages, the societal reluctance to embrace it mirrors the initial skepticism around cremation — a hesitation rooted in cultural and emotional resistance rather than practicality.

Lessons from the Past

The historical journey of cremation offers a hopeful precedent for water cremation advocates. Over time, public perception shifted as education and exposure dispelled misconceptions. Cremation transitioned from taboo to mainstream, demonstrating that societal norms around death are not immutable.

The debate over alkaline hydrolysis reflects humanity’s struggle to reconcile tradition with progress. While opposition remains strong, history suggests that as understanding grows, so too may acceptance. Like cremation before it, water cremation may one day become a normalized and even preferred practice, symbolizing another step in our evolving relationship with mortality and the environment.